Archive for February, 2006

Electric Blankets

Monday, February 27th, 2006

This morning, I went to the dryer to get some socks, and I found that all of the clothes had been sucked into a balled-up blanket. I began to shake the blanket, but there was a towel that was stuck to it. As I pulled the towel from the blanket, blue sparks flew through the air (I’m not exaggerating). It popped and crackled like a gas stove when you first light it. And it hurt too! Nevertheless, it was quite a scientific experience.

I think, if we were able to spin the dryer fast enough, we could achieve fission. That would explain how socks always come up missing. Hmmmm…

Bookmark and Share

Midnight Oil

Sunday, February 26th, 2006

It is 2AM, but I thought I would try to get some writing done. My intention is to have my book finished by the end of this summer and then have it in the stores by next year, inshaAllah. Yes, Lantern Torch also does editing and publishing. :) We are quite a multi-faceted organization.

I have at least two more books that I would like to write after that (in the near future).

I feel that I owe some explanation about Bayt-al-Hikmah. The premise for it began when I was working at an Islamic school in Chicago. In essence, it is a non-profit library, mainly geared towards Islam, but also holding a collection of books from other revealed religions (Judaism, Christianity, etc). The goal is to make it public so that anyone can check out the books, just as they would in a public library, with library cards. I have figured out a way to get the initial funding. The only issue that remains is how to keep it funded. I would prefer not to rely on donations, as most religious organizations do.

After I get one successful Bayt al-Hikmah (House of Wisdom) going, I’d like to send the plans and structure to Muslims all over the world so that they can also start similar ventures, inshaAllah. Who knows, maybe they’ll even make it happen before I do. I think it is something that is needed, and since I am a Librarian, I am hoping that I have something useful to contribute to the Ummah. Allah knows best!

Bookmark and Share

Seestani to the rescue…Again?

Friday, February 24th, 2006

Since the United States illegally invaded Iraq, their military and politicians have made one blunder after another. Amazingly, there has been one common factor that has consistently saved Iraq from spiraling into oblivion and, indirectly, saved the U.S. from utter failure. That factor is an old man, probably not unlike your sweetest grandfather, who lives in a simple house and wears old, simple clothing.

But this man is the leader of millions of people, not only in Iraq, but all over the world. His name is Ayatullah al-’Udhma Ali Seestani. He is not pro-America, nor is he pro-Iran. His goals have always been clear: protect the interests of the Iraqi people.

When the U.S. invaded, toppled Saddam’s regime and set up a laughable provisional government, Ayatullah Seestani insisted that the Iraqis hold elections as soon as possible. The U.S. refused, and so Ayatullah Seestani sent his followers into the streets to protest. Eventually, the U.S. caved into their demands. Seestani himself, penned and reviewed the election plans and the laws that would be setup for the interim government, a fact that U.S. media conveniently hides. Instead, the Bush administration championed the elections as though they had organized them. In reality, they had resisted them, preferring to keep their new Ba’athist boy, Iyad Allawi, in position as long as possible.

When the young, fiery scholar, Muqtada al-Sadr, raised the banner of jihad and sent his Mahdi army into the streets of Najaf to fight the U.S. military and drive them out “once and for all,” the Americans saw their dreams of a “liberated Iraq” slipping away. Al-Sadr was poised to start another Islamic Revolution, one that would see the Iranians take center-stage in reshaping and rebuilding Iraq. Seestani, at the time, was having surgery in London. Upon his return, al-Sadr, like a disobedient grandson, silenced his rhetoric, retired his army, and turned the keys of Imam ‘Ali’s shrine back over to the “Grand Ayatullah.”

But was Ayatullah Seestani trying to aide the Americans in stopping the Mahdi Army? Absolutely not. His goal, as always, was to protect the people of Najaf, to protect the grave site of Imam Ali (peace be upon him), and to protect one of the greatest learning institutions on the planet, Al-Hawza. Furthermore, Ayatullah Seestani had no more interest in having Iran play too much of a role in reshaping Iraq than the Americans. The difference is that he does not want Iranians to be his enemies. He is Iranian himself. But Iraq must be able to stand on its own, and for that, he has repeatedly asked for the Americans to leave.

Instead, they have remained, ignoring the one sane voice coming out of Iraq. With hope slipping away, after the attacks on the grave site of Imam ‘Ali al-Naqi (peace be upon him) and Imam Hasan al-’Askari (peace be upon him), the 10th and 11th Imams, the U.S. is shivering at the thought of all out civil war. But so far, civil war has not happened. Yes, sectarian violence in on the rise, but, considering the number of Shi’a in Iraq, the power of their leadership, and the organization of their militias, they could easily and effectively crush any Sunni resistance, but they have not. Why?

Ayatullah Seestani issued a statement. Thus, the majority of shi’as have remained calm, only involving themselves in peaceful protest. The leader of Iran, Ayatullah Khamene`i, issued a similar statement, refusing to bow down to the pressure of a few lunatics who insist on starting a Muslim-on-Muslim civil war. Iran has no interest in doing so, as they did not when Saddam imposed the Iran-Iraq war on them in the 80s. Had Seestani said only one word, “fight,” every Shi’a in the known world would have taken up arms, but he did not. He will not, inshaAllah.

So, once again, Ayatullah Seestani might have saved Iraq and the U.S. from sudden death. But now the question remains, will the U.S. finally start listening to this man? Iraqis listen to him; Iranians listen to him; even people in Pakistan listen to him. The only person reasonably capable of ruling Iraq is the one person who does not want the job, but, whether he wants it or not, people will continue to look to him for guidance. I think it is about time Mr. Bush does the same, before it is too late.

Bookmark and Share

Violence Begets Violence

Thursday, February 23rd, 2006

I was going to write a lengthy response to the attack on the grave site of Imam Ali al-Naqi (peace be upon him) and Imam Hasan al-’Askari (peace be upon him), but Sunni Sister did a really good job, and you should just read hers.

I will say, however, that no Muslim has the right to attack the graves of anyone (Muslim or non-Muslim) much less the graves of Ahlul-bayt.

I think that this is a time when we should learn something about these Imams, because that is what the nasibiyya (haters of Ahlul-bayt) wish to erase by attacking their graves. But they cannot make us (those Muslims, both Sunni and Shi’a, who love them), forget.

Imam Muhammad ibn ‘Ali al-Baqir (the 5th Imam) once said, “The true nasibi (hater of Ahlul-bayt) is not one who shows antagonism towards us, the family of the Prophet. You will not find anyone who will say, ‘I hate Muhammad and his family.’ The true nasibi is one who antagonizes you, our followers (shi’a).”

Once Bahlul (may Allah have mercy on him) saw a young child sitting in a puddle of water on the ground, crying and wailing. The child was Imam Hasan al-’Askari. Bahlul went to him and asked him why he was crying. Despite his young age, the boy began reciting ayaat about the Day of Judgment and about other heavy matters. Bahlul said to him, “Why are you concerned with these things? You are not even baligh (of age) yet.” Imam al-’Askari replied,

“I have watched my mother kindle a fire, how she uses the smaller sticks to ignite the larger ones, and I am afraid that Allah will do the same thing with me.”

This pure soul, a child, an Imam of all the Muslims in the world, is afraid of Allah’s punishment to the point where he is in tears. What of those who attack his grave and defile the religion that he sought to preserve?

Bookmark and Share

The ‘Ugly Face of American Racism’

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

From IndyMedia:

“The following interview of Professor Tony Van Der Meer was conducted by Bryan G. Pfeifer over the course of December 2005 and January 2006.

“In April 2003 Mr. Tony Van Der Meer, a Black adjunct professor of Africana studies at the University of Massachusetts Boston was assaulted and arrested by campus police after challenging an Army National Guard recruiter who threatened a student distributing leaflets for an anti-war commemoration honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.. Van Der Meer objected to the recruiter’s remark that the student should be shot like Dr. King.

Read the Interview at The Boston IMC

Bookmark and Share

Rare Kiwi Bird Hatches in US Zoo

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

From National Geographic:

“This North Island brown kiwi hatched at the Smithsonian’s National Zoo in Washington, D.C., this week-only the second of these rare birds to hatch during the zoo’s 116-year history.

“Kiwi chicks hatch fully feathered with their eyes open and begin foraging for small worms and berries after their first week of life, since they receive no help from their parents.”

Isn’t it cute?

Bookmark and Share

Baby Language

Monday, February 20th, 2006

Zahra seems to be somewhere between the human realm and the baby realm. She talks non-stop, but most of it is unintelligible. She knows a lot of words, and ever so often, she’ll inject them into her baby realm language, but usually it’s just gibberish. When she wants something, however, she suddenly becomes very eloquent.

It makes me wonder. Is there truly “another” language that babies intuitively have from birth but lose as they become children? Your thoughts?

Bookmark and Share

Star Wars: Episode Before

Sunday, February 19th, 2006

I had a dream about this last night. So, bear with me…

Mace Windu (Played by Samuel L. Jackson): “We have to get off of this planet!”
Padawan: “Yes, Master…Wait a minute! I thought you were dead?”

Mace: “I don’t have time for this now.”
Padawan: “No No, I’m sure of it. You were dead. I saw you fly out of the window in Episode III. That was quite a dramatic scream.”

Mace: “This is before that”
Padawan: “Before what?”

Mace: “This is before Episode III”
Padawan: “Master, how is that possible?”

Mace: “The ways of Lucas, I mean the Force, are unknown to many. This is before. Episode III was then.”
Padawan: “I thought Episode III was now?”

Mace: “No, now is now. Episode III was then.”
Padawan: “I thought now was before?”

Mace: “Before IS now!”
Padawan: “Well, when will now be then?”

Mace: “Soon. Now, let’s go.”
Padawan: “But Master, if this is before Episode III, and Episodes I and II were also then, what is now?”

Mace: “This is Episode 0.1″
Padawan: “Master, how is that possible?”

Mace: “It’s a prequel.”

Padawan: “But I thought Episodes one, two, and three were the prequels?”

Mace: “And this is the prequel to the prequel, now get in the ship!”
Padawan: “Yes, Master.”

(The Padawan boards the ship).
(Master Yoda enters).

Yoda: “Full of questions, the young boy is.”
Mace: “I don’t trust him!”

Bookmark and Share

On the Road Again…

Saturday, February 18th, 2006

I got my tire fixed, and it only cost me $10! Alhamdulillah. When I was outside in the parking lot changing the tire, it was about 20 degrees outside, and I had not eaten all day. My arms and legs were shaking, but my S-Dad showed up to help me.

Anyway, when I was changing the tires, I was glad that I don’t have hubcaps. Those things can be nasty to have to pop off, and when you put them back on, you have to make sure they’re on well so they don’t go rolling down the street (not to mention that, in the neighborhood where I park, they get stolen all the time). I have some killer mags on my car (I’ll post a picture soon, insha’Allah). They’d have to steal the whole wheel to get them.

Bookmark and Share

Iran, Sufism, and Politics

Friday, February 17th, 2006

It was brought to my attention that certain groups organized by the Iranian government recently cracked down on a Nimatullahi protest in Qom. Not having all the facts at my disposal, I can say that there are a number of problems with the reactions to this development (both by the Iranian government and by Muslims and non-Muslims around the world).

1. The Iranian government has developed a history of suppressing demonstrations and protests, even those sanctioned by the government (this can only be characterized as either paranoia or serious control issues.

2. The reaction from the non-Muslim world is predictable (blaming the entire Iranian government, the Islamic revolution, and “Islamist” movements in general).

3. The reaction from Sunni Muslims around the world is very short-sighted. They immediately associate an Iranian backlash against sufis as a Shi’a backlash against Sufism.

Again, I can only go by what I know and what I’ve heard from the many people I’ve known who live in Iran and were even in Iran during the Islamic Revolution.

1. Like most new governments, the Iranian government certainly has paranoia and control issues and over exerts the “required patriotism” that is commonplace in all nation states. That’s not an excuse for their actions. It must change, reforms must happen, and protests must continue. That, however, is no reason to trash the regime. If it was, then the American government and it’s disgusting racist white slave masters should have been the first to be “trashed” by Native Americans and African Americans. But we have persevered with kindness and hope for the future, because we know that the average patriotic white American is not representative of the government. Similarly, many of the Iranians, even those who started and perpetuated the Islamic Revolution, have the sincerest intentions and goals. And the constitution of Iran is one of the most Islamic and just in the world. It is up to the people to make sure that their government lives up to it, as it has been in America and elsewhere.

2. There’s really not much to say about this. Obviously, “Islamists” can be good or bad. It is not the goal of spreading Islam and living by Islam that is the problem. It is those who seek to sabotage for their own material gains.

3. To answer my Sunni brethren honestly, sufism is not alien to the Shi’a school of thought. In fact, it was only through our Imams that it even survived. And the proof of that is that 90-something percent of sufi tariqas trace their chains through Imam Ali (peace be upon him). Also, many of the ahadith that sufis hold dear are scrutinized by some sunnis (and all salafis), but our Imams have upheld them and verified their authenticity.

If it were not for the Imams of Ahlul-bayt, Sufism would have ceased to exist. Nevertheless, the Imams always strove to preserve the Shari’ah and ensure that people would not deviate from the path under the guise of Sufism. Even the most intoxicating experience (I mean this in terms of religious intoxication) is no excuse to do or claim anything contrary to the Shari’ah, and I’m sure most Sunnis will agree with that.

Finally, these are the kinds of issues about which Muslims should pressure the Iranian authorities, to live up to the high standards and aims of the Islamic Revolution. The politics of Iran’s nuclear program should not be our concern. Our concern should be with upholding justice and Islamic ethics. I do not believe that Iran owes the western world’s governments any kind of explanation, but as Muslims whose fellow Muslims (the sufis in question) have a right over us, we have a right to know what is going on and an obligation to enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong.

Bookmark and Share