Apple continuously boasts on its web site how so
much of OS X and its software apps are based on open source
software. Safari is their poster-child for oss. I'm not
entirely sure why they repeatedly mention it. Perhaps it makes
them appear innocent and wholesome. I know plenty of librarians (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Librarian)
who see it as a cute and naively open source alternative to Windows
while also still cuter than Linux (http://www.linux.org).
Well, the truth is, OS X and Safari are anything but free, and they do
little to nothing to contribute to the free software projects from
which they so liberally borrow code. KDE (http://www.kde.org) developers have
repeatedly complained about how Apple is not revealing the CVS history
of their changes to KHTML (the KDE (http://www.kde.org)-based browser engine that powers
Safari), so their changed sources are essentially useless towards
reintegration back into Konqueror (the KDE (http://www.kde.org) KHTML-based browser).
I still maintain that the best way to promote intellectual freedom and
growth, especially in libraries, is to run and distribute free
software. Besides, what message would I send to my kids if I
promoted hardware (Macs) and software (OS X, etc.) that they could
never afford?
Slashdot reports (http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/29/1556252&from=rss):
Zack Rusin writes: 'All I'm asking for is that all the clueless people stop talking about the cooperation (http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1002)
between Safari/Konqueror developers and how great it is. There's
absolutely nothing great about it. In fact it doesn't exist.'

