<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modern Islam,  Traditional Moderation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lanterntorch.com/al-islam/60/modern-islam-traditional-moderation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lanterntorch.com/al-islam/60/modern-islam-traditional-moderation/</link>
	<description>Creative Illumination</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leila</title>
		<link>http://www.lanterntorch.com/al-islam/60/modern-islam-traditional-moderation/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Leila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lanterntorch.com/?p=60#comment-22</guid>
		<description>There's an interesting chapter in Juan Cole's book "Sacred Space and Holy War" in regards to the Iranian revolution.  He argues, and rightly so, that it wasn't a retrogressive movement, but very very modern.  He also points out that modern doesn't necessarily equate itself with liberal, Iran in many ways being an anti-liberal govt.  I happen to concur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting chapter in Juan Cole&#8217;s book &#8220;Sacred Space and Holy War&#8221; in regards to the Iranian revolution.  He argues, and rightly so, that it wasn&#8217;t a retrogressive movement, but very very modern.  He also points out that modern doesn&#8217;t necessarily equate itself with liberal, Iran in many ways being an anti-liberal govt.  I happen to concur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
